CO129-258 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [1-4] — Page 201

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

DRAFT.

G KONG

Governor

Sir W. Robinson, K.C.M.G.

Hong Kong

2848

200

Downing Street,

April, 1893.

02

MINUTE. 7 April

Mr. Johnson 14

Mr. Lucas 16.

X Mr. Fairfield. 20-

Mr. Wingfield.

Mr. Bramston.

Mr. Meade.

Mr. Burton.

20

Marquess of Ripon. 2/

Sir,

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your despatch No. 12 of the 17th January last forwarding a Memorial from the Unofficial Members of the Legislative Council in support of their Protest of the 13th of December and praying that Her Majesty should be advised to refuse her assent to the Appropriation Ordinance (No. 12 of 1892) and that a Commission should be appointed to investigate and report upon the cost of the local administration itself.

2. I have already in my despatch No. 25 of 16th February dealt with the Protest, and in my despatch No. 24 of the 14th February I informed you that Her Majesty would not be advised to disallow the Ordinance and that I was satisfied that no sufficient reason had been shown for reducing the salaries of any of the existing officers of the service.

3. I...

Edit History

2026-05-26 22:29:41 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
DRAFT. G KONG Governor Sir W. Robinson, K.C.M.G. Hong Kong 2848 200 Downing Street, April, 1893. 02 MINUTE. 7 April Mr. Johnson 14 Mr. Lucas 16. X Mr. Fairfield. 20- Mr. Wingfield. Mr. Bramston. Mr. Meade. Mr. Burton. 20 Marquess of Ripon. 2/ Sir, I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your despatch No. 12 of the 17th January last forwarding a Memorial from the Unofficial Members of the Legislative Council in support of their Protest of the 13th of December and praying that Her Majesty should be advised to refuse her assent to the Appropriation Ordinance (No. 12 of 1892) and that a Commission should be appointed to investigate and report upon the cost of the local administration itself. 2. I have already in my despatch No. 25 of 16th February dealt with the Protest, and in my despatch No. 24 of the 14th February I informed you that Her Majesty would not be advised to disallow the Ordinance and that I was satisfied that no sufficient reason had been shown for reducing the salaries of any of the existing officers of the service. 3. I...
Baseline (Original)
* DRAFT. G KONG ernor Bir W. Robinson, K.C.M.G. Hong Phong 2848 200 akto Downing Street, April, 1893. 02 MINUTE. 7 april Mr. Johnson 14 Mr. Lucas 16. X Mr. Fairfield. 20- Mr. Wingfield. Mr. Bramston. Mr. Meade. Mr. Burton. 20 Marquess of Ripon. 2/ Sir, I have the honour to acknow- ledge the receipt of your despatch No. 12 of the 17th January last forwarding a Memorial from the Unofficial Members of the Legislative Council in support of their Protest of the 13th of Decem- ber and praying that Her Majesty should be advised to reïuse her assent to the Appropriation Ordinance (No. 12 of 1892) and that a Commission should be ap- drafted for consideration pointed to investigate and report upon itself the cost or the local administration 2. I have already in my despatch No. 25 of 16th February dealt with the Protest, and in my despatch No. 24 of the 14th February I informed you that Her Majesty would not be advised to dis allow the Ordinance and that I was satisfied that no sufficient reason had been shown for reducing the salaries of any of the existing officers of the service. 3.I
2026-05-26 22:29:41 · Baseline
View content

*

DRAFT.

G KONG

ernor

Bir W. Robinson, K.C.M.G.

Hong Phong

2848

200

akto

Downing Street,

April, 1893.

02

MINUTE. 7 april

Mr. Johnson 14

Mr.

Lucas 16.

X Mr. Fairfield. 20-

Mr. Wingfield.

Mr. Bramston.

Mr. Meade.

Mr. Burton.

20

Marquess of Ripon. 2/

Sir,

I have the honour to acknow-

ledge the receipt of your despatch No. 12 of the 17th January last forwarding

a Memorial from the Unofficial Members

of the Legislative Council in support

of their Protest of the 13th of Decem-

ber and praying that Her Majesty should

be advised to reïuse her assent to the

Appropriation Ordinance (No. 12 of 1892)

and that a Commission should be ap-

drafted for consideration pointed to investigate and report upon

itself

the cost or the local administration

2. I have already in my despatch

No. 25 of 16th February dealt with the

Protest, and in my despatch No. 24 of

the 14th February I informed you that

Her Majesty would not be advised to dis

allow the Ordinance and that I was

satisfied that no sufficient reason had

been shown for reducing the salaries

of any of the existing officers of the

service.

3.I

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.